D I S C O V E R    L I F E   
Bee Hunt! Odonata Lepidoptera 
  HomeAll Living ThingsIDnature guidesGlobal mapperAlbumsLabelsSearch
  AboutResearchEducationProceedingsPolistes FoundationPartnersLinksHelp

Picea rubens Sarg.

Red spruce

Links

80x5 - 240x3 - 240x4 - 320x1 - 320x2 - 320x3 - 640x1 - 640x2
Set display option above.
Click on images to enlarge.
Picea rubens, Whole tree
© Copyright Steve Baskauf, 2002-2005
Picea rubens, Whole tree
Picea rubens, Leaf
© Copyright Steve Baskauf, 2002-2005
Picea rubens, Leaf

Picea rubens, Twig
© Copyright Steve Baskauf, 2002-2005
Picea rubens, Twig
Picea rubens, Leaf
© Copyright Steve Baskauf, 2002-2005
Picea rubens, Leaf

Picea rubens, Bark
© Copyright Steve Baskauf, 2002-2005
Picea rubens, Bark
Picea rubens, Leaf
© Copyright Steve Baskauf, 2002-2005
Picea rubens, Leaf

Names
Scientific source:
      Integrated Taxonomic Information System


Following modified from The Gymnosperm Database
   
Top | See original

Gymnosperm Database
Link to jump to start of content Home Topics Bookstore Links Site Map Contact Us

search Google
the whole Web
conifers.org

map

A small tree on a rocky outcrop on Vinalhaven Island, Maine [C.J. Earle, 2003.07].

map

Foliage on the above tree. The "tufted" appearance distinguishes this species from Picea glauca or P. mariana [C.J. Earle, 2003.07].

map

Detail of twigs and foliage from a tree on Mt. Mitchell, North Carolina [C.J. Earle, 2004.10.25].

map

Current year cones on the above tree. Cone size is intermediate between Picea glauca and P. mariana [C.J. Earle, 2003.07].

map

Previous year cones on the above tree [C.J. Earle, 2003.07].

map

Bark on 30 cm (above) and 35 cm (below) dbh trees on Mt. Mitchell in North Carolina [C.J. Earle, 2004.10.25].

map

Trees in habitat on Grandfather Mountain, North Carolina [C.J. Earle, 2004.10.26].

map

Distribution map ( USGS 1999 .

Picea rubens

Sargent 1898

Common Names

Red spruce, eastern spruce, yellow spruce, épinette rouge (Canadian French) ( Taylor 1993 ).

Taxonomic notes

Syn: Picea australis Small 1903; P. nigra (Aiton) Link var. rubra (DuRoi) Engelmann; P. rubra (DuRoi) Link 1831, not A. Dietrich 1824. In eastern Canada this species hybridizes to a limited extent with P. mariana ( Taylor 1993 ).

Description

Trees to 40 m tall and 100 cm dbh; "crown narrowly conic. Bark gray-brown to reddish brown. Branches horizontally spreading; twigs not pendent, rather stout, yellow-brown, densely pubescent to glabrate. Buds reddish brown, 5-8 mm, apex acute. Leaves 0.8-2.5(3) cm, 4-angled in cross section, somewhat flexuous, yellow-green to dark green, not glaucous, bearing stomates on all surfaces, apex mostly acute to sharp-pointed. Seed cones 2.3-4.5(5) cm; scales broadly fan-shaped, broadest near apex, 8-12 × 8-12 mm, stiff, margin at apex entire to irregularly toothed. 2 n =24" ( Taylor 1993 ). Cones ovoid, glossy, orange-brown (c.f. P. mariana ), fusiform, matte.

Range

Canada: Ontario, Québec, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia; France: St. Pierre and Miquelon; USA: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and Tennessee; at 0-2000 m in upper montane to subalpine forests ( Taylor 1993 ). See also Thompson et al. (1999) . USDA hardiness zone 3.

Big Tree

The official "big tree", and the tallest known specimen, are both within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The "big tree" is 44.7 m tall with a 123 cm dbh and 7.3 m crown spread ( American Forests 2008 ). The tallest known tree is 46.33 m tall ( Rucker 2003 ).

Oldest

On 19-Oct-2005, the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal published an account describing how Ben Phillips, a graduate student at Mount Allison University, had found a tree 445 years old while studying the Fundy basin fog forest in New Brunswick, Canada. His major professor, Colin Laroque, informed me that "The tree had a very complex life. We crossdated it with other trees in the stand for about 300 years, and these trees crossdated very well with our other samples from the region. We then crossdated it back for about another 100 years using chronologies from dated and undated historical structures that we had in our database from the region. The tree(s) helped lock in a few floaters and so we are very confident it crossdates back to nearly the pith of the tree. The tree was 13.5 cm from pith to bark on one side and slightly longer on the other. The core was taken at breast height and so it is older than the 445, but we do not want to speculate on how long it took to reach DBH" (Colin Laroque e-mail 2005.19.23).

Formerly, the oldest known individual was 424 years (crossdated) for specimen 106061 collected on Grandfather Mountain, NC by Ed Cook (NCDC 2006).

Dendrochronology

Quite a few tree-ring studies were done in studies of the effects of acid rain on tree growth; examples include work by Adams et al. (1990), Cook et al. (1992), and Johnson and Siccama (1989). It has also been used in many forest decline studies and environmental chemistry studies that grew out of the acid rain work, studies of spruce budworm, studies of climate variation, growth-and-yield studies, forest history studies, and a few methodological and miscellaneous ecological studies.

Ethnobotany

The long roots were pulled up by native peoples, peeled and split for lacing. The pitch was used for patching holes and leaking seams ( Native Tech ). The gum was formerly collected and processed for chewing gum (Hart 1959). Early settlers (and no doubt some modern homebrewers) used the fresh green foliage to flavor fermenting beer. It is still harvested for timber.

Observations

Can be readily seen in high elevation forests of the Appalachian Mountains, including the Great Smokies National Park (NC/TN), the White Mountains (NH) and the Adirondacks (NY).

Remarks

Air pollution, including both acid preciptiation and nitrogen deposition, has been implicated in extensive dieback of red spruce forests in the Appalachian Mountains (Eagar and Adams 1992). "Up to now, acid rain has been associated with the decline of forests in certain specific locations. DeHayes and colleagues, UVM senior researcher Gary Hawley and USDA Forest Service scientist and UVM adjunct faculty Paul Schaberg previously documented the mechanism through which acid rain depletes calcium and weakens high elevation red spruce trees, making them more vulnerable to winter freezing injury. Their new work shows that this mechanism is also applicable to other tree species, including balsam fir, white pine, and eastern hemlock. Because calcium is a critical ingredient in the plant's stress response system, acid rain's depletion of cellular calcium may suppress the capacity of trees to survive environmental stresses" (Science Daily, 2002.07.18). There is a huge literature on this subject; to get a sampling, try " acid rain red spruce " in your search engine.

Red spruce is the provincial tree of Nova Scotia ( Taylor 1993 ).

Citations

Adams, H.S., McLaughlin, S.B., Blasing, T.J., Duvick, D.N. 1990. A survey of radial growth trends in spruce in the Great Smokey Mountains National Park as influenced by topography, age, and stand development. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Publication TM-11424. 62 pp.

Cook, E.R. and Zedaker, S.M. 1992 The dendroecology of red spruce decline. P. 192-231 in Ecology and Decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States (C. Eagar and M.B. Adams, eds.). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Hart, Arthur C. 1959. Silvical characteristics of red spruce . Paper No. 124. Durham, NH: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 18 p.

Johnson, A.H. and Siccama, T.G. 1989. Decline of red spruce in the high-elevation forests of the northeastern United States. P. 191-234 in Air Pollution's Toll on Forests and Crops (J.J. MacKenzie and M.T. El-Ashry, eds.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

[NCDC 2006] Data accessed at the National Climatic Data Center World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Tree-Ring Data Search page, 2006.09.08. URL: http://hurricane.ncdc.noaa.gov/pls/paleo/fm_createpages.treering .

See Also

Burns and Honkala (1990) .

Eagar, C. and M.B. Adams (eds.). 1992. Ecology and Decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States . Ecological Studies 96. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Farjon (1990) .

Little (1980) .

FEIS database .

Mello, Robert A. 1987. Last Stand of the Red Spruce. Island Press. Washington, DC. 199 pp.

Morgenstern and Farrar (1964) .

Sargent (1922) .

Seymour, Robert S. 1995. Northeastern Spruce-Fir Forests. In Status and Trends of the Nation's Biological Resources . USGS electronic publication. http://biology.usgs.gov/s+t/SNT/noframe/ne121.htm , accessed 2002.09.03.

Home

Back | Picea | Pinaceae | Home | Site map | Contact us

Copyright

Edited by Christopher J. Earle

Page updated on 2009.02.08
URL: http://www.conifers.org/pi/pic/rubens.htm

Back to top

Following served from Iowa State University
   
Top | See original context

Following modified from US Forest Service
   
Top | See original

Picea rubens Sarg.

Red Spruce

Pinaceae -- Pine family

Barton M. Blum

Red spruce (Picea rubens), also known as yellow spruce, West Virginia spruce, eastern spruce, and he-balsam, is one of the more important conifers in the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. It is a medium-size tree that may grow to be more than 400 years old. The wood of red spruce is light in color and weight, straight grained, and resilient. It is used for making paper, for construction lumber, and for musical stringed instruments. Its many uses rival those of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) (21).

Habitat

Native Range

The range of red spruce extends from the Maritime Provinces of Canada west to Maine, southern Quebec, and southeastern Ontario, and south into central New York, eastern Pennsylvania, northern New Jersey, and Massachusetts. It also grows south along the Appalachian Mountains in extreme western Maryland, and eastern West Virginia, and north and west in Virginia, western North Carolina, and eastern Tennessee. Discontinuous stands may also be found in Haliburton Township, in Algonquin Provincial Park, and near Sturgeon Falls in Nippising Township, and in the southwestern Parry Sound District in Ontario, Canada.

{The native range of Picea rubens}
- The native range of red spruce.

Climate

Red spruce grows best in a cool, moist climate. The climate of the northeastern part of its range can be summarized as follows: annual precipitation (total), 910 to 1320 mm (36 to 52 in); annual snowfall, 203 to 406 cm (80 to 160 in); days with snow cover, 100 to 140; January temperature, -7° to -1° C (20° to 30° F) maximum and -18° to -13° C (0° to 8° F) minimum; July temperature, 21° to 27° C (70° to 80° F) maximum, and 11° to 14° C (52° to 58° F) minimum; frost-free days, 90 to 150 (28). Red spruce attains maximum development in the higher parts of the southern Appalachian Mountains where the atmosphere is more humid and the rainfall heavier during the growing season than in other parts of its range (47). Local extension of the range of red spruce, as along the southern Maine coast, is related to marine exposure, which provides a cool growing season and ample moisture supply (8).

Soils and Topography

The soils where red spruce and its associates grow are mostly acid Spodosols, Inceptisols, and sometimes Histosols with a thick mor humus and a well-defined A 2 horizon- characteristics commonly associated with abundant rainfall, cool climates, and softwood cover (11). Commonly, the pH of these soils ranges from 4.0 to 5.5. In northern New England, red spruce is found predominantly on shallow till soils that average about 46 cm (18 in) to a compact layer. It will grow on many sites unfavorable for other species, such as organic soils overlying rocks in mountainous locations, steep rocky slopes, thin soils, and wet bottomland (26). On poorly drained soils, lack of aeration limits growth (22).

In the northern part of its range, red spruce grows at elevations from near sea level to about 1370 m (4,500 ft) (22). In the southern Appalachian Mountains it comes in at elevations as low as 1370 m (4,500 ft) and from there to about 1520 m (5,000 ft) it is mixed with hardwoods and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). At 1520 m (5,000 ft) balsam fir (Abies balsamea) joins with red spruce to form the dominant spruce-fir climax type. In West Virginia, spruce-fir stands are found as low as 980 m (3,200 ft). Above 1890 m (6,200 ft) in the southern Appalachians, red spruce appears less frequently than Fraser fir (Abies fraseri) (47). In the White Mountains of New Hampshire, balsam fir is the predominant species above 1220 m (4,000 ft) but red spruce is well represented from about 790 to 1010 m (2,600 to 3,300 ft) (27).

Associated Forest Cover

Pure stands of red spruce comprise the forest cover type Red Spruce (Society of American Foresters Type 32). Red spruce is also a major component in 5 and a minor component in 13 other forest cover types (10):

    5  Balsam Fir
  12  Black Spruce
  16  Aspen
  17  Pin Cherry
  18  Paper Birch
  21  Eastern White Pine
  22  White Pine-Hemlock
  23  Eastern Hemlock
  25  Sugar Maple-Beech-Yellow Birch
  30  Red Spruce-Yellow Birch
  31  Red Spruce-Sugar Maple-Beech
  33  Red Spruce-Balsam Fir
  34  Red Spruce-Fraser Fir
  35  Paper Birch-Red Spruce-Balsam Fir
  37  Northern White-Cedar
  60  Beech-Sugar Maple
107  White Spruce
108  Red Maple

Some of the shrubs associated with red spruce are: blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), hobblebush (Viburnum lantanoides), witherod (V. cassinoides), rhodora (Rhododendron canadense), lambkill (Kalmia angustifolia), mountain-holly (Nemopanthus mucronata), speckled alder (Alnus rugosa), red raspberry (Rubus idaeus var. strigosus), creeping snowberry (Gaultheria hispidula), wintergreen (G. procumbens), fly honeysuckle (Lonicera canadensis), gooseberry (Ribes spp.), witch-hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), downey serviceberry (Amelanchier arborea), beaked hazel (Corylus cornuta), and Canada yew (Taxus canadensis).

A number of mosses and herbs are also found growing in red spruce forest types. Certain mosses, herbs, and shrubs, however, have been shown to be related to site quality of red spruce (22). The three main associations, Hylocomium/Oxalis, Oxalis/Cornus, and Viburnum/0xalis, in that order, indicate increasing site productivity and increasing hardwood competition. Similar site types in the higher elevations of the Appalachian Mountains of North

Carolina include Hylocomium/Oxalis on north-facing slopes above 1520 m (5,000 ft), Oxalis/Dryopteris at high elevations and all exposures, and the best site type for red spruce and Fraser fir, Viburnum/Vaccinium/Dryopteris (47).

The Oxalis/Cornus association is considered the best for growing conditions in the northern part of the range. On these sites the soil is rich enough for red spruce but not fertile enough for the tolerant hardwoods to offer serious competition (22).

Life History

Reproduction and Early Growth

Flowering and Fruiting- Red spruce is monoecious; male and female flower buds open in May in axils of the previous year's shoots on different branches of the same tree. The pendant male flowers are bright red; female flowers are erect and bright green tinged with purple (21). Although cone buds differentiate as early as July preceding flowering in the following spring, they are difficult to distinguish until September. For experienced workers they provide a possible means of identifying seed years at that time. The cones mature from about mid-September to early October, the autumn following flowering (41). Cones are 3 to 4 cm (1.3 to 1.5 in) long, light reddish brown, with rigid, rounded scales often slightly toothed on the edges. Cones are receptive to pollen when fully open, a condition which lasts for only a few days.

Seed Production and Dissemination- Good seed crops occur every 3 to 8 years, with light crops during intervening years (22). Red spruce cones number about 140/liter (5,000/bu), which yields 454 to 680 g (1.0 to 1.5 lb) of seeds. The number of cleaned seeds per kilogram ranges between 220,000 and 637,000 (100,000 and 289,000/lb), with an average of about 306,000 (139,000/lb) (41).

Red spruce seeds fall about 1.2 m (4 ft) per second in still air; the following formula determines distance of travel for wind- disseminated spruce seeds at various heights (47):

D = S h (1.47 v )

Where D = distance in feet which seed will travel, S = number of seconds required for seed to fall from a height of h (ft) on a tree, and v = velocity of the prevailing wind in miles per hour.

Randall (37), in a study of seed dispersal into clearcut areas, stated that at a distance of 100 m (5 chains or 330 ft) from the timber edge, the number of spruce seeds trapped were more than adequate for regeneration in a good seed year and adequate in an average year. Most of the spruce in the surrounding stands was red spruce.

Seedling Development- Most red spruce seeds germinate the spring following dispersal; some, however, may germinate in the fall soon after dropping from the tree. Germination is epigeal. On favorable seedbeds the usual spring germination period is from late May to early July. On duff, which is more subject to surface drying than most other seedbed materials, some seeds may lose viability by midsummer, and some may show delayed germination well into August (22). Little if any viable seeds remain in the forest floor beyond 1 year (13).

Adequate moisture is the chief factor controlling germination of red spruce. Germination takes place on almost any medium (mineral soil, rotten wood, or shallow duff) except sod. Mineral soil is an excellent seedbed for germination. Generally ample moisture is available and soil temperatures are moderate. Litter and humus are poorer seedbeds because they are likely to be hotter and drier than mineral soil (11). On thicker duff, germination may be poor also because moisture conditions are less favorable. Temperatures of 20° to 30° C (68° to 86° F) are generally favorable for germination. Seeds will not germinate satisfactorily at temperatures below 20° C (68° F) and are permanently injured by long exposure to temperatures higher than 33° C (92° F) (22).

Germination and initial establishment proceed best under cover. Seedlings can become established under light intensities as low as 10 percent of full sunlight; however, as they develop, they require light intensities of 50 percent or more for optimum growth. Seedlings starting in the open undergo heavy mortality when soil surface temperatures reach 46° to 54° C (115° to 130° F) even for a short time (11). Drought and frost heaving are major causes of mortality the first year. Crushing by hardwood litter and snow are also causes of seedling mortality. Winter drying in some years and locations can cause severe leader damage and dieback.

Natural reproduction depends more on seedling survival than on requirements for germination. Spruce seedlings have an exceptionally slow-growing, fibrous, shallow root system. Consequently, a critical factor in their survival and establishment is the depth of the 01 organic layers of the soil profile. When the combined thickness of these layers exceeds 5 cm (2 in), spruce seedlings may not reach mineral soil and the moisture necessary to carry them through dry periods. Red spruce seedlings and the commonly associated balsam fir seedlings are similar in many ways and are controlled by the same factors, but as a rule spruce is the weaker, slower growing species during the establishment period (22).

Seedlings that have attained a height of about 15 cm (6 in) can be considered established. Once established, their early growth is determined largely by the amount and character of overhead competition. Dense growth of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum), raspberry, and hardwood sprouts are the chief competition for seedlings on heavily cutover lands; but red spruce survives as much as 145 years of suppression and still responds to release (11,39).

Compared to its associates, red spruce is one of the last species to start height growth in the spring, usually beginning the first week in June and ending 9 to 11 weeks later. Radial growth usually begins about the second week of June and continues through August (22).

Vegetative Reproduction- Red spruce rarely, if ever, layers (15,22,45). Recently developed techniques facilitate propagation from stem cuttings under controlled conditions, particularly juvenile cuttings (7,9,38,45).

Sapling and Pole Stages to Maturity

Growth and Yield- Red spruce is a medium-size tree at maturity, reaching 30 to 61 cm (12 to 24 in) in d.b.h. and 18 to 23 m (60 to 75 ft) in height in the Northeast, and up to 35 m (115 ft) in the Appalachian Mountains. Its maximum age is about 400 years (22). The American Forestry Association lists a tree 133 cm (52.5 in) in d.b.h. and 33.5 m (110 ft) tall in Great Smoky National Park in North Carolina as the largest living red spruce.

The rate of red spruce's growth is strongly influenced by light conditions. Although trees can live in dense shade for many years, once they reach sapling to pole stage nearly full sunlight is beneficial. Understory trees no more than 1.2 or 1.5 m (4 to 5 ft) tall may be more than 50 years old, whereas trees of the same age in the open may be approaching small sawtimber size (22).

Under favorable conditions, red spruce may reach an average d.b.h. of 10 cm (4 in) and height of 7 m (23 ft) in 20 years, and be over 23 cm (9 in) in d.b.h. and 19 m (62 ft) tall in 60 years (22).

Diameter growth of red spruce has been related to vigor, live crown ratio (ratio of live crown to total height), live crown length, and initial diameter at breast height (6,32). High vigor red spruce with a live crown ratio of 0.5 or better averaged 4.3 cm (1.7 in) of diameter growth in 10 years. Growth rates of trees with smaller crown ratios and less vigorous trees decreased progressively to an average of 0.8 cm (0.3 in) in 10 years for trees of low vigor or with crown ratios smaller than 0.4 (22). A tree classification for red spruce is shown in table 1 (11).

Table 1- Classification of red spruce trees (11).

Tree class
(rating as
growing stock)


Vigor


Crown class
Live
crown
ratio¹

Average 10-year growth in d.b.h.

cm in
A, superior
I
Dominant and
  Intermediate
0.6+ 4.6 1.8
B, good I
Dominant and
  Intermediate
0.3 to 0.5 3.3 1.3
C, acceptable II Overtopped
  Intermediate
  Dominant
0.6+
0.6+
0.6+
2.3 0.9
D, inferior Intermediate 0.3 to 0.5 1.5 0.6
E, undesirable
III Intermediate
All others
0.3+
0.3 or less
0.5 0.2

¹Ratio of live crown to total height.

In one study (40), average net annual growth in softwood stands (66 to 100 percent softwood species) that can be expected from stands receiving minimal silvicultural input was found to be about 3.5 m³/ha (50 ft³/acre). In mixed-wood stands (21 to 65 percent softwood species) this dropped to about 2.8 m³/ha (40 ft³/acre), although the majority of the growth was contributed by softwoods. A further breakdown of the data shows the contributions of spruce, most of which was assumed to be red spruce, to be 51 percent in softwood stands and 39 percent in mixed-wood stands.

Yields per acre, in total volumes of all trees larger than 1.5 cm (0.6 in) in d.b.h. (inside bark and including stump and top but not butt swell), are given in table 2 (33).

Table 2- Yield of red spruce by age class and site index (adapted from 33)

Site index¹


Age
12.2 m
or 40 ft
15.2 m
or 50 ft
18.3 m
or 60 ft
21.3 m
or 70 ft

yr m³/ha
20 6 8 11 14
40 94 132 164 200
60 244 335 422 507
80 308 424 533 640
100 332 456 575 691
yr ft³/acre
20 80 120 160 200
40 1,350 1,890 2,350 2,850
60 3,490 4,780 6,030 7,240
80 4,400 6,060 7,610 9,150
100 4,740 6,250 8,210 9,870

¹Base age 50 years when age is measured at d.b.h.- total tree age is estimated to be 65 years at the time.

These yields are normal yields from even-aged stands growing primarily on old fields. Therefore, they are higher than yields that might be expected from more irregular stands such as those developing after cutting (22).

Site index has not been of great utility in rating the potential productivity of spruce-fir sites because of the tolerance of the species and its ability to survive in a suppressed state. Site index at base age 50 years is as good a measure of productivity as any of several growth functions, however (39). Recently, polymorphic site index curves were developed for even-aged spruce and fir stands in northern Maine; they should be valuable for estimating site productivity (20).

Other yield tables for the Northeast (48) take into consideration stand density, composition, and time since cutting. These tables give merchantable volume of spruce and fir combined in trees 15.2 cm (6 in) in d.b.h. and larger from a 0.3 m (1 ft) stump to a 7.6 cm (3 in) top, diameter inside bark, and are somewhat conservative. Yields of merchantable volume for different stand densities from 10 to 50 years after cutting, where 90 percent of the trees are spruce and fir growing on predominantly softwood sites, are given in table 3.

Table 3- Merchantable yield of red spruce (adapted from 48)

Density index (regional average 100)

Years since cut 50 100 150

m³/ha
10 17.1 24.4 29.5
20 29.8 37.7 43.3
30 43.5 52.0 58.0
40 58.1 67.3 73.4
50 73.8 83.1 89.7
ft³/acre
10 245 349 422
20 425 539 618
30 622 743 828
40 830 961 1,049
50 1,054 1,187 1,281

The development of stand projection growth models that permit computer simulation of red spruce tree growth for various management practices and silvicultural treatments over a range of stand conditions has flourished in recent years. For example, the model FIBER was developed in the Northeast (43) for spruce-fir, northern hardwood and a range of Mixedwood forest types between the two. Such models have proved very useful for forest management planning.

In recent years, interest in total biomass yield and productivity has increased, and in the future is likely to become more important in management considerations. As an example, above-ground biomass and productivity values of typical red spruce stands in Canada are given in table 4 for stands in a steady state, across a moisture regime catena (17).

Table 4- Aboveground biomass and annual production of all tree components and foliage for red spruce at latitude 45° 30' N. (adapted from 17)

Moisture regime
Biomass
Annual
Production

t/ha tons/acre t/ha tons/acre
Dry 121.3 54.1 4.5 2.0
Fresh 263.2 117.4 8.7 3.9
Moist 461.3 205.8 9.9 4.4
Wet 164.1 73.2 3.8 1.7

Rooting Habit- Spruce and fir are shallow-rooted, with most of the feeding roots in the duff and the top few centimeters of mineral soil (11). The average rooting depth for all sites in Maine was found to be 33 cm (13 in), with a maximum of 56 cm (22 in) (22).

Reaction to Competition- Red spruce is classified as shade tolerant in the United States and tolerant or very tolerant in Canada. Opinions differ as to whether red spruce is more tolerant than balsam fir, but the relative tolerance may vary with soil fertility and climate (22).

The species' chief competition comes from balsam fir and hardwoods that produce heavy shade, like beech and maple. Competition from aspen, birch, and other thin-crowned species is not so severe. Red spruce prunes itself about as well as most softwoods in dense stands. As much as one-third of the live crown may be pruned artificially without seriously affecting radial growth (5).

A number of studies have demonstrated the ability of red spruce to respond to release after many years of suppression. The vigor of this response does decline somewhat with age, however, and older trees may require about 5 years to recover before showing accelerated growth (7). Reduction of growth to about 2.5 cm (1 in) of diameter in 25 years, for a duration of 100 years, represents about the limit of suppression for red spruce. Many of its associated tree species such as balsam fir and hemlock may outgrow red spruce after release (22).

Red spruce may be grown successfully using even-age silvicultural prescriptions (11,12). Red spruce is very shallow-rooted, however, making it subject to windthrow, a major silvicultural constraint in the management of the species. As a general rule, it is recommended that no more than one-fourth to one-half of the basal area be removed in the partial harvest of a spruce-fir stand, depending on site, to avoid excessive windthrow damage.

Most of the major forest cover types previously listed in which red spruce is a component are considered either climax or subclimax.

Damaging Agents- The shallow root system, thin bark, and flammable needles of red spruce make trees of all ages very susceptible to fire damage (11). The acreage of red spruce originally present in the southern Appalachians has been reduced to a fraction of what it once was by fire and clearcutting (22). Many former spruce sites are occupied by inferior tree species, blackberries, and ferns after 20 years (47).

The most important insect enemy of red spruce is the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Although red spruce is much less vulnerable to damage than balsam fir or white spruce, largely due to later bud flushing in the spring (3), much damage and mortality occur in stands containing large quantities of mature balsam fir. Blum and McLean (4) suggest that factors such as stand age, species composition, density, and vigor contribute to the vulnerability of spruce-fir stands to budworm damage and suggest steps to alleviate damage. Additional, detailed information may also be found in Sanders, et al. (42) for spruce-fir stands in the Northeast, the Lake States, and Canada.

The eastern spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis, damages mature trees of red spruce. Two species of sawflies, the European spruce sawfly, Diprion hercyniae, and the native yellowheaded spruce sawfly, Pikonema alaskensis, have severely defoliated red spruce in localized areas (22). The eastern spruce gall adelgid, Adelges abietis, can be a serious pest on spruce when abundant. The pine leaf adelgid, Pineus pinifoliae, forms unsightly but relatively harmless conelike galls on red and black spruce (Picea mariana), which are alternate hosts (46).

Red spruce has few diseases. Needle cast caused by Lirula macrospora may result in severe defoliation of the lower crown and a subsequent reduction of growth. Phellinus pini and Phaeolus schweinitzii, the most destructive of red spruce wood-rotting fungi, are usually confined to overmature or damaged trees. Climacocystis borealis causes butt rot in overmature trees (22). Trees are occasionally attacked by Armillaria mellea and Inonotus tomentosa.

All along the eastern Appalachian mountain chain, from the New England states to Georgia, growth has declined in high-elevation red spruce since the 1960's (25). In recent years, this decline has been accompanied by increased mortality and crown damage in high-elevation red spruce. Apparently, no significant natural biotic or abiotic causal agents have been identified, although it has been hypothesized that interaction among naturally occurring insect and disease factors and anthropogenic air pollutants, or air pollutants acting alone, are at the root of the problem. Sulphur dioxide (S0 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compounds are the pollutants of primary concern; secondary pollutants such as ozone and nitric and sulfuric acids are also believed to be important factors (29).

Growth decline and mortality in low-elevation red spruce in northern New England, while increasing in some areas, appear to be within the normal ranges for trees and forests of various ages, compositions, and density. However, some foliar symptoms have been detected in both red spruce and white pine, particularly from ozone exposure.

Red spruce is occasionally infected with eastern dwarf mistletoe, Arceuthobium pusillum, a parasite causing growth reduction, tree mortality, and degradation of wood quality (24).

Mice and voles have been found to consume and store significant amounts of spruce seeds in preference to those of balsam fir, suggesting one reason for the low ratio of spruce to fir seedlings commonly found in naturally regenerated stands (1,23). Wildlife damage to the terminal buds of young spruce, presumably by birds, also has been noted (2). Some injury and mortality are also caused occasionally by porcupines, bears, deer, and yellow-bellied sapsuckers (11). Red squirrels clip twigs and terminals and eat reproductive and vegetative buds (41).

Special Uses

The wood of red spruce, white spruce (Picea glauca), and black spruce cannot be distinguished with certainty by either gross characteristics or minute anatomy, and all three are usually marketed simply as eastern spruce. Chief uses are for lumber and pulpwood, with limited amounts going into poles piling, boatbuilding stock, and cooperage stock (36) Flakeboard and plywood have been made from spruce in recent years. It is also the preferred wood for piano sounding boards, guitars, mandolins, organ pipes, and violin bellies (21).

Forest cover types that include red spruce support a wide variety of wildlife. They are particularly important as winter cover for deer and, to a certain extent, moose. Small game includes ruffed grouse, snowshoe hare, and woodcock. Many song birds and fur bearers also frequent these forest types (44).

A unique use of red spruce was spruce gum, an exudate that accumulates on trunk wounds. This was the raw material for a flourishing chewing-gum industry in Maine during the last half of the 19th century and early years of this century (21).

Genetics

Successful interspecific crosses with Picea rubens as male or female parents have been reported or confirmed for P. mariana, P. omorika, P. glehnii, P. orientalis, and P. koyamai (15); P. sitchensis (14); P. glauca, P. mexicana (16); P. x lutzii Little (P. sitchensis x P. glauca), P. maximowiczii, and P. likiangensis (19).

Crossability of P. rubens with P. omorika is good with P. mexicana and P. likiangensis moderate; with P. mariana, P. orientalis, P. maximowiczii, and P. glehnii fair to poor; and with P. koyamai, P. sitchensis, P. x lutzii , and P. glauca very poor. Several species fail to cross with P. rubens (15,16,18,19).

Hybrids between P. rubens and P. mariana occur to some extent in nature, but parental species remain phenotypically pure in their characteristic habitats (15,30,31,34,35).

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott, Herschel G., and Arthur C. Hart. 1960. Mice and voles prefer spruce seeds. USDA Forest Service, Station Paper 153. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 12 p.
  2. Blum, Barton M. 1977. Animal damage to young spruce and fir in Maine. USDA Forest Service, Research Note NE-231. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 4 p.
  3. Blum, Barton M. 1988. Variation in the phenology of bud flushing in white and red spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:315-319.
  4. Blum, Barton M., David A. McLean. 1984. Chapter 6: Silviculture, forest management, and the spruce budworm. p. 83-101. In Schmitt, Daniel M.; David G. Grimble, and Janet L. Searcy, tech. coords. Managing the spruce budworm in eastern North America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 620. Washington, DC.
  5. Blum, Barton M., and Dale S. Solomon. 1980. Growth trends in pruned red spruce trees. USDA Forest Service, Research Note NE-294. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 6 p.
  6. Bowen, A. Temple, Jr. 1964. The relation of tree and stand characteristics to basal area growth of red spruce trees in partially cut stands in eastern Maine. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 627. Orono. 34 p.
  7. Brix, H. R., and R. van den Driessche. 1977. Use of rooted cuttings in reforestation: a review of opportunities, problems, and activities. British Columbia Forest Service/Canadian Forestry Service, Joint Report 6. Ottawa, ON. 16 p.
  8. Davis, Ronald B. 1966. Spruce-fir forests of the coast of Maine. Ecological Monographs 36(2):94.
  9. Dancik, B. P. 1980. Forest genetics studies at the University of Alberta. In Proceedings, Seventeenth Meeting, Canadian Tree Improvement Association. Pt. 1. p. 201-205.
  10. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 p.
  11. Frank, Robert M., and John S. Bjorkbom. 1973. A silvicultural guide for spruce-fir in the Northeast. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-6. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 29 p.
  12. Frank, Robert M., and Barton M. Blum. 1978. The selection system of silviculture in spruce-fir stands-procedures, early results, and comparisons with unmanaged stands. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NE-425. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 15 p.
  13. Frank, Robert M., and Lawrence 0. Safford. 1970. Lack of viable seed in the forest floor after clearcutting. Journal of Forestry 68(12):776-788.
  14. Girouard, R. M. 1970. Propagating four species of spruce by stem cuttings. Canadian Forestry Service, Bi-monthly Research Notes 26(4):29-31.
  15. Gordon, Alan G. 1976. The taxonomy and genetics of Picea rubens and its relationship to Picea mariana. Canadian Journal of Botany 54(9):781-813.
  16. Gordon, Alan G. 1978. Genecology and the contribution of genetic variation to productivity systems in spruce forest ecosystems. In Proceedings Sixteenth Meeting, Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Pt. 1. p. 89-91.
  17. Gordon, Alan G. 1979. Productivity and nutrient cycling in natural forests. In Canada/MAB Report 12, Biomass Strategy Consultation. p. 34-49. Co-sponsored by the Canadian Committee for the UNESCO Program on Man and the Biosphere (MAB) and the Science Council of Canada.
  18. Gordon, Alan G. 1980. Spruce genetics, Sault Ste. Marie in 1977 and 1978. In Proceedings, Seventeenth Meeting Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Pt. 1. p. 117-12 1.
  19. Gordon, Alan G. 1980. Genetics and genecology of spruce, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, 1979 and 1980. In Proceedings, Eighteenth Meeting, Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Pt. 1. p. 89-91.
  20. Griffen, Ralph H., and James E. Johnson. 1970. Polymorphic site index curves for spruce and balsam fir growing in even-aged stands in northern Maine. University of Maine Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station, Bulletin 765. Orono. 22 p.
  21. Hart, Arthur C. 1959. Silvical characteristics of red spruce (Picea rubens). USDA Forest Service, Station Paper 124. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 18 P.
  22. Hart, Arthur C. 1965. Red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) In Silvics of forest trees of the United States. p. 305-310. H. A. Fowells, comp. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 271. Washington, DC.
  23. Hart, Arthur C., Hershel G. Abbott, and Edward R. Ladd. 1968. Do small mammals and birds affect reproduction of spruce and fir? USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NE-110. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 8 p.
  24. Hawksworth, F. G., and A. L. Shigo. 1980. Dwarf mistletoe on red spruce in New Hampshire. Plant Disease Reporter 64:880- 882.
  25. Hertel, Gerard D. 1987. Spruce-fir research cooperative: a program description. Spruce-fir research cooperative, USDA Forest Service, Broomall, PA. 22 p.
  26. Leak, W. B. 1976. Relation of tolerant species to habitat in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NE-351. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 10 p.
  27. Leak, William B., and Raymond E. Graber. 1974. Forest vegetation related to elevation in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NE-299. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 7 p.
  28. Lull, Howard W. 1968. A forest atlas of the Northeast. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 46 p.
  29. MacKenzie, James J., and Mohammed T. El-Ashry. 1988. 111 winds: airborne pollution's toll on trees and crops. World Resources Institute. 74 p.
  30. Manley, S. A. M. 1972. The occurrence of hybrid swarms of red and black spruces in central New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2(4):381-391.
  31. Manley, S. A. M., and F. Thomas Ledig. 1979. Photosynthesis in black and red spruce and their hybrid derivatives: ecological isolation and hybrid adaptive inferiority. Canadian Journal of Botany 57(4):305-314.
  32. McLintock, Thomas F. 1948. Evaluation of tree risk in the spruce-fir region of the Northeast. USDA Forest Service, Station Paper NE-16. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 7 p.
  33. Meyer, Walter H. 1929. Yields of second-growth spruce and fir in the northeast. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 142. Washington, DC. 52 p.
  34. Morgenstern, E. K. 1969. Survival and growth of red spruce provenances in three experiments in Ontario. In Proceedings, Eleventh Commonwealth Forest Tree Breeding Meeting. p. 206-211.
  35. Morgenstern, E. K., A. G. Corriveau, and D. P. Fowler. 1981. A provenance test of red spruce in nine environments in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 11(l):124-131.
  36. Ostrander, M. D. 1974. Eastern spruce ... an American wood. USDA Forest Service, FS-263. Washington, DC. 10 p.
  37. Randall, Arthur G. 1974. Seed dispersal into two spruce-fir clearcuts in eastern Maine. University of Maine Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station, Research in the Life Sciences 21(8):15.
  38. Rauter, R. M. 1980. Genetic improvement of spruce and larch for Ontario, 1977-78. In Proceedings, Seventeenth Meeting, Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Pt. 1. p. 123-128,
  39. Safford, Lawrence 0. 1968. Evaluation of growth characteristics of individual free-growing red spruce trees as a means of estimating forest productivity. Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Maine, Orono. 148 p.
  40. Safford, Lawrence 0. 1968. Ten year average growth rates in the spruce-fir region of northern New England. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NE-93. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 20 p.
  41. Safford, L. 0. 1974. Picea A. Dietr. Spruce. In Seeds of woody plants in the United States. p. 587-597. C. S. Schopmeyer, tech. coord. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 450. Washington, DC.
  42. Sanders, C. J., R. W. Stark, E. J. Mullins, J. Murphy, eds. 1985. Recent advances in spruce budworm research: Proceedings, CANUSA Spruce Budworms Research Symposium, September 16-20, 1985, Bangor, ME. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, ON. 527 p.
  43. Solomon, Dale S., Richard A. Hosmer, and Homer T. Hayslett, Jr. 1987. FIBER handbook: a growth model for spruce-fir and northern hardwood types. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NE-602. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA. 19 p.
  44. Society of American Foresters (Maine Chapter). 1977. Improvement, maintenance, and protection of fish and wildlife habitat. The Maine Forest Review 11:2-8.
  45. Stanek, W. 1967. Natural layering of red spruce in Quebec. Canadian Forestry Service, Bi-monthly Research Notes 23(6):42.
  46. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1979. A guide to common insects and diseases of forest trees in the northeastern United States. USDA Forest Service, NA-FR-4. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Broomall, PA. 123 p.
  47. Walter, Lawrence C. 1967. Silviculture of the minor southern conifers. p. 56-62. Stephen F. Austin State College School of Forestry, Bulletin 15. Nacogdoches, TX.
  48. Westveld, M. 1953. Empirical yield tables for spruce-fir cutover-lands in the Northeast. USDA Forest Service, Station Paper 55. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA. 64 p.

Following modified from Virginia Tech Dendrology
   Top | See original

Following modified from Plants Database, United States Department of Agriculture
   Top | See original

Link: Skip repetitive navigation links
USDA and NRCS Identifier NRCS Logo
USDA.gov Web Site PLANTS photo banner
PLANTS Home  about PLANTS  PLANTS Team  Partners of PLANTS  What  National Plant Data Center Web Site  Help using PLANTS  Contact PLANTS
 
 Search the PLANTS Web site
 Name Search

 State Search
 Advanced Search
 Search Help
PLANTS Topics
 
 Alternative Crops
 Characteristics
 Classification
 Culturally Significant
 Distribution Update
 Fact Sheets & Plant Guides
 Invasive and Noxious Weeds
 Links
 Plant Materials Publications
 Threatened & Endangered
 Wetland Indicator Status
 
PLANTS Image Gallery
 
 40,000+ Plant Images
 Submit Your Digital Images
 
Download PLANTS data
 
 Complete PLANTS Checklist
 State PLANTS Checklist
 Advanced Search Download
 Symbols for Unknown Plants
 NRCS State GSAT Lists
 NRCS State Plants Lists
 PLANTS Posters
 
Related tools
 
 Crop Nutrient Tool
 Ecological Site Information System
 PLANTS Identification Keys
 Plant Materials Web Site
 Other NRCS Tech
Resources
 VegSpec
 
 
You are here: Home / PLANTS Profile Printer-Friendly Printer-Friendly / Plug-Ins
PLANTS Profile
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Texas Utah Washington Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Alberta British Columbia Manitoba Labrador Saskatchewan Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut Greenland

 

Picea rubens Sarg.
red spruce

       
Symbol:   PIRU  
Group:   Gymnosperm  
Family:   Pinaceae  
Duration:   Perennial  
Growth Habit:   Tree  
Native Status:  
L48    N
CAN    N
SPM    N



Click on the image below to enlarge it and download a high-resolution JPEG file.
Photo of Picea rubens Sarg.
Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA NRCS. 1995. Northeast wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species . Northeast National Technical Center, Chester. Courtesy of USDA NRCS Wetland Science Institute . Usage Requirements .
 
More Information:
 

Images:
Picea rubens Sarg.

Click on a thumbnail to view an image, or see all the Picea thumbnails at the PLANTS Gallery
View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Picea rubens Sarg. View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Picea rubens Sarg. View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Picea rubens Sarg. View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Picea rubens Sarg. View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Picea rubens Sarg.
 

Synonyms:
Picea rubens Sarg.

  PIAU2 Picea australis Small
 

Distribution:
Picea rubens Sarg.

View Native Status
Distribution Map Legend

See U.S. county distributions (when available) by clicking on the map or the linked states below:

USA ( CT , MA , MD, ME , NC , NH , NJ , NY , PA , TN , VA , VT , WV ), CAN (NB, NF, NS, ON, PE, QC), FRA (SPM)
 

Related Taxa:
Picea rubens Sarg.

View 9 genera in Pinaceae , 12 species in Picea
 

Classification:
Picea rubens Sarg.

Click on a scientific name below to expand it in the PLANTS Classification Report.
   
Kingdom Plantae – Plants
Subkingdom Tracheobionta – Vascular plants
Superdivision Spermatophyta – Seed plants
Division Coniferophyta – Conifers
Class Pinopsida
Order Pinales
Family Pinaceae – Pine family
Genus Picea A. Dietr. – spruce
Species Picea rubens Sarg. – red spruce
 

Threatened and Endangered Information:
Picea rubens Sarg.

This plant is listed by the U.S. federal government or a state. Common names are from state and federal lists. Click on a place name to get a complete protected plant list for that location.

Connecticut :
red spruce              Special Concern
New Jersey :
red spruce              Endangered
 

Wetland Indicator Status:
Picea rubens Sarg.

Nat. Ind. Reg. 1 Reg. 2 Reg. 3 Reg. 4 Reg. 5 Reg. 6 Reg. 7 Reg. 8 Reg. 9 Reg. 0 Reg. A Reg. C Reg. H
FACU FACU FACU NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Interpreting Wetland Indicator Status
 

More Accounts and Images:
Picea rubens Sarg.

View photographs from CalPhotos.

View species account from USDA Forest Service Fire Effects Information System (FEIS).

View species account and distribution map from Flora of North America (FNA).

View species account from ARS Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN).

View taxonomic account from Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) for ITIS Taxonomic Serial Number 18034.

View species account from Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center Native Plant Information Network (NPIN).

View species account from Native American Ethnobotany (University of Michigan - Dearborn).

View photographs and distribution from University of Tennessee Herbarium.

 

Related Web Sites:
Picea rubens Sarg.

Canada-Official Plants of Nova Scotia

USDA Forest Service-Silvics of North America

 
 
Time Generated: 02/09/2010 05:04 PM MST  

 PLANTS Home | USDA.gov | NRCS | Site Map | Policies and Links
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement

Following modified from CalPhotos
   Top | See original


CalPhotos     Photo Database

 

Number of matches : 2
Query: SELECT * FROM img WHERE ready=1 and taxon like "Picea rubens%" and (lifeform != "specimen_tag" OR lifeform != "Plant") ORDER BY taxon

Click on the thumbnail to see an enlargement

Picea rubens
Picea rubens
Red Spruce
ID: 0000 0000 0506 2597 [detail]
© 2006 Louis-M. Landry

Picea rubens
Picea rubens
Red Spruce
ID: 0000 0000 0508 1105 [detail]
© 2008 Louis-M. Landry

Using these photos: A variety of organizations and individuals have contributed photographs to CalPhotos. Please follow the usage guidelines provided with each image. Use and copyright information, as well as other details about the photo such as the date and the location, are available by clicking on the [detail] link under the thumbnail. See also: Using the Photos in CalPhotos .   


Copyright © 1995-2010 UC Regents. All rights reserved.

CalPhotos is a project of BSCIT     University of California, Berkeley

Updated: 2010-02-10 00:08:57 gmt
Discover Life | Top
© Designed by The Polistes Corporation