D I S C O V E R    L I F E   
Bee Hunt! Odonata Lepidoptera 
  HomeAll Living ThingsIDnature guidesGlobal mapperAlbumsLabelsSearch
  AboutResearchEducationProceedingsPolistes FoundationPartnersLinksHelp

Pinus flexilis E. James

Limber pine

Links


Names
Scientific source:
      Integrated Taxonomic Information System


Following modified from The Gymnosperm Database
   
Top | See original

Gymnosperm Database
Link to jump to start of content Home Topics Bookstore Links Site Map Contact Us
search Google
the whole Web
conifers.org

[Search hints]

line drawing

A tree approximately 20 m tall on Cave Mountain, Nevada (C.J. Earle, 2001.09.27).

line drawing

Foliage with first-year cone and weathered wood on a tree in the Ruby Mountains of Nevada (C.J. Earle, 2001.09.23).

line drawing

Bark on a tree in the Ruby Mountains of Nevada (C.J. Earle, 2001.09.23).

line drawing

Cone of a tree on Cusick Mountain, Oregon, about 8 cm long (C.J. Earle, 2008.07.20).

line drawing

Cone of a tree on Mt. San Jacinto, California, about 10 cm long (C.J. Earle, 2004.04.10).

line drawing

Cone of a tree on Cerro Potosí, Nuevo León, about 12 cm long (C.J. Earle, 2007.02.20).

line drawing

The Cerro Potosí, cone along with several P. strobiformis cones from the same stand (C.J. Earle, 2007.02.20).

map

Distribution map ( USGS 1999 .

photograph

The official largest limber pine, near Snowbird, UT. "Big Tree" Bob Van Pelt for scale [C.J. Earle, 1995.08.03].

photograph

Closed-canopy forest of Pinus flexilis, Pinus longaeva , and Picea engelmannii on Cave Mountain, Nevada. These two pines very rarely form a closed-canopy stand [C.J. Earle, 2001.09.27].

photograph

A large, old tree near the summit of Mt. San Jacinto, California [C.J. Earle, 2004.04.10].

photograph

The Dielman Monarch, a large, old tree on the slopes of Cusick Mountain, Oregon [C.J. Earle, 2008.07.20] (aside: Cusick Mountain was named for pioneering Oregon botanist William Cusick .

 

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional

Pinus flexilis

E. James 1823

Common names

Limber pine, limbertwig, Rocky Mountain pine ( Peattie 1950 ), pino ( Perry 1991 ), white pine ( Little 1980 ), pin blanc de l'ouest ( Kral 1993 ).

Taxonomic notes

Section Cembra. Syn: Apinus flexilis (E. James) Rydberg ( Kral 1993 ). One variety, Pinus flexilis var. reflexa Engelmann 1879 (syn: P. reflexa (Engelmann) Engelmann 1882; P. ayacahuite var. strobiformis Lemmon 1892; P. ayacahuite var. reflexa (Engelmann) Voss 1907; P. flexilis subsp. reflexa (Engelmann) Murray 1982; P. stylesii Frankis ex Businský 2008) ( Farjon and Styles 1997 ).

Typical P. flexilis is quite uncontroversial. It its northern ranges it is quite clearly distinct from all other white pines and really shows little variation throughout its range. Var. reflexa , due to its hybrid origin, has had a history steeped in controversy, and remains the subject of much debate. Farjon and Styles (1997) regard P. flexilis and P. strobiformis as forming a polymorphic cline, while Perry (1991) regards them as distinct taxa with introgression in their shared range. I have not had a chance to study var. reflexa in its western ranges, where the hybridization with P. strobiformis is most complex and widespread. I have seen it on Cerro Potosí, where it has recently been described as a new species Pinus stylesii , and will comment on that area.

Cerro Potosí is a remarkable place in many ways. It is a gigantic limestone monolith in westernmost Nuevo León. There are a couple of minor peaks to the west and northwest that approach it in altitude (over 3,700 meters), but apart from these, it is the tallest thing for several hundred kilometers in any direction. Biogeographically, it is an extraordinarily isolated island, and contains a goodly number of endemic plant species. Among these is Pinus culminicola , a pinyon, arguably the world's smallest pine (up to 3 m tall). The top thousand meters or so of the mountain are dominated by a conifer forest of, from the top down, Pinus culminicola , Pinus hartwegii , Pinus flexilis var. reflexa , Pinus strobiformis , Pseudotsuga menziesii , Abies vejarii , and Pinus arizonica var. stormiae . Still lower are Pinus cembroides , Pinus greggii , and Pinus nelsonii . It is a Mecca for rare pines.

Jesse Perry (1991) described Pinus flexilis from the summit of Cerro Potosí, and in evidence provides a photograph of a P. flexilis cone collected at 3,400 m near the summit. P. flexilis at its current closest approach is a thousand kilometers to the west in the mountains of New Mexico. Data on its previous range in this vast desert land are scanty, but based on reconstructions of temperature and precipitation during the Pleistocene, say 10,000 to 18,000 years ago, it is quite plausible that the species could have been common on Cerro Potosí and on many other ranges in Texas and northern Mexico. 18,000 years ago was an eyeblink in evolutionary time, 50 generations for a long-lived species like P. flexilis , and it is highly implausible that P. flexilis living around Cerro Potosí 18,000 years ago might have evolved through classical Darwinian selection into a new species. It is certainly plausible, though, that hybridization may have been at work over such a time scale.

The white pines of northern Mexico and the southwestern US form quite an incestuous family. Noticable variations in morphology occur along nearly continuous gradients extending from southern Arizona and New Mexico south along both the Sierra Madre Occidental and Oriental and extending along the full breadth of the Central Volcanic Plateau. Various authors have described an array of species and subspecies in these white pines, including P. flexilis , P. strobiformis , P. brachyptera , and P. ayacahuite , and now P. stylesii . I have examined each of these taxa in several portions of its range and find that every one of them can be confused with at least one of the others in some part of its range. Such a pattern of variation is consistent with an hypothesis of hybridization and/or introgression on species margins, and the pattern is quite common in conifers of the pine family, occurring for instance among the spruces of Sichuan, the Caucasian firs, or the cedars of Turkey.

Based, then, upon the paleoclimate history of the area and the biogeographic setting of Cerro Potosí, it is my belief that the taxon lately described as Pinus stylesii arose initially from the hybridization of P. flexilis and P. strobiformis in the mountains of Nuevo León, probably during late Pleistocene climate changes that caused relatively rapid range changes for plants growing in that area. P. flexilis may have persisted for a time on Cerro Potosí, perhaps even into the historic era, but introgression to the tiny remnant population on the summit of Potosí, coupled with the high incidence of disturbance (chiefly by fire) on that mountaintop, doomed it to eventual extinction. The remnant hybrid pines also constitute a very small island of flexilis -like pines amongst a sea of P. strobiformis , and their distinctive genetic composition may in the future continue to become more like that of typical P. strobiformis as hybridization events continue to accumulate (to say nothing of the effects of projected climate change). Thus, the populations described as P. stylesii are biologically an artifact, a snapshot of the final events in extinction of an isolated remnant population of P. flexilis .

There is one interesting consequence of this interpretation: although these trees are here described as P. flexilis var. reflexa , they likely contain rather more genes from P. strobiformis than from P. flexilis , and in the future continued backcrossing with P. strobiformis will only continue that trend. Thus it would probably be more genetically accurate to call them a P. flexilis -like variety of P. strobiformis . However, no such variety has been described.

Three photographs presented here show cones of limber pine in northeast Oregon, in extreme southern California, and on the summit of Cerro Potosí. A fourth photograph shows the Cerro Potosí cone along with several P. strobiformis cones collected at the same locale. All cones appeared to have developed normally and produced a large fraction of normally developed seed (based on the observaton that all had been thoroughly gleaned by corvids), and all cones appeared representative of their local populations. Based on this evidence, supported by evidence from foliage, bark and general tree form amongst the Cerro Potosí trees, I am satisfied that the trees I found on Cerro Potosí can be described as P. flexilis × strobiformis hybrids, i.e., P. flexilis var. reflexa .

Description

Trees 12-15(26) m tall; 60-90(200) cm diameter, straight to contorted; crown conic, becoming rounded; growth form may be substantially altered near timberline (krummholz form occurs) or on very dry sites. Bark light grey, nearly smooth, becoming dark brown and cross-checked in age into scaly plates and ridges. Branches spreading to ascending, often persistent to trunk base; twigs pale red-brown, puberulous (rarely glabrous), slightly resinous, aging gray, tough and flexible, smooth. Buds ovoid, light red-brown, 0.9-1 cm, resinous; lower scales ciliolate along margins. Needles 5 per fascicle, spreading to upcurved and ascending, persisting 5-6 years, 3-7 cm × 1-1.5 mm, pliant, dark green, abaxial surface with less conspicuous stomatal bands than adaxial surfaces, adaxial surfaces with strong, pale stomatal bands, margins finely serrulate, apex conic-acute to acuminate; sheath 1-1.5(-2) cm, shed early. Staminate cones broadly ellipsoid-cylindric, ca. 15 mm, pale red or yellow. Ovulate cones maturing in 2 years, shedding seeds and falling soon thereafter, spreading, symmetric, lance-ovoid before opening, cylindro-ovoid when open, 7-15 cm long, yellow-brown, resinous, sessile to short-stalked, apophyses much thickened, strongly cross-keeled, umbo terminal, depressed. Seeds irregularly obovoid; body 10-15 mm, brown, sometimes mottled darker, wingless or nearly so. 2 n =24 ( Little 1980 , Kral 1993 ).

In the absence of cones, it strongly resembles P. albicaulis . However, limber pine twigs become roughened at a smaller size, usually <10 cm diameter, vs. >10 cm diameter in P. albicaulis . On older trees (>30 cm dbh), limber pine bark is usually composed of longitudinal reddish-brown plates with intervening fissures, while whitebark pine bark becomes light brown and thinly platy without conspicuous fissures. When in flower, whitebark pollen cones are a striking red color, while limber pine pollen cones are reddish or yellow. Saplings are very difficult to distinguish; Kral (1993) contends that bud scale margins are entire in whitebark pine, whereas lower bud scales have ciliolate margins in limber pine. I have not tested this assertion in the field.

Range

Rocky Mountains and Intermountain Ranges from Canada: SE British Columbia and SW Alberta, S through USA: Oregon, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah and Nevada to N New Mexico and W through N Arizona to S California at (1000)1500-3700 m, preferring dry, rocky slopes and ridges of high mountains up to timberline, often occurring in pure stands ( Little 1980 , Kral 1993 ); perhaps in Mex: Nuevo León (see Taxonomic Notes). See also Thompson et al. (1999) . Var. reflexa may occur in the USA: Arizona, New Mexico and W Texas (populations identified as P. strobiformis ), and is known from a few locales in Mexico (Chihuahua, Coahuila and S Nuevo León) but may have a more extensive range in that country ( Farjon and Styles 1997 ).

Big tree

Height 18 m, dbh 222 cm, crown spread 14 m. Locality: On a ridge S of Snowbird, Utah ( American Forests 1996 ).

Oldest

Crossdated ages of 1,670 years from site ERE in New Mexico, collected by Swetnam and Harlan; and 1659 years for specimen KET3996 from Ketchum, Idaho collected by Schulman in 1956 ( Brown 1996 ). Given the fact that crossdated tree ages are always underestimates because of the near-impossibility of sampling the tree's seedling growth years, either of these trees could have been the older, particularly since KET3996 was sampled about 30 years before the ERE tree. During a 1994 visit to Craters of the Moon National Monument, I believe I located KET3996; it was dead, and had been for many years.

Dendrochronology

Limber pine is an important species due to its longevity and widespread occurrence in the arid U.S.

Ethnobotany

There is some evidence that the seeds were used as a food source by certain Great Basin tribes, such as the Northern Shoshone. Numerous grinding stones at Alta Toquima Village, a high elevation prehistoric site in central Nevada, also suggest use of pine nuts as food, with limber pine the likely source ( Lanner 1996 ). I have observed that miners, sheepherders, and other rural residents if its range (ca. 1850-1950) used it for cabins, fencing, mine timbers, and doubtless, firewood. However, the wood is too contorted and resinous, and the trees generally too small, to warrant commercial exploitation.

Observations

The most memorable stands I have seen have been:

  • Craters of the Moon National Monument in Idaho, which has numerous groves and an interesting history. Many ancient limber pines in the Monument were killed by the Park Service in the early 1960s in a poorly conceived attempt to eradicate a mistletoe infestation.
  • The timberline grove along the trail up Borah Peak, Idaho. This site is a particularly worthy objective for photographers, as in contains many ancient and extremely gnarled trees. These limbers are the ones, in my experience, that most closely resemble the extremely ancient and gnarled growth form typically associated with P. longaeva .
  • The forest near the summit of Cave Mountain, southeast of Ely, Nevada. A steep road passable for light trucks and sturdy sedans climbs to a communications complex on the summit of this peak and affords access to an extensive stand of P. flexilis and P. longaeva . The east-facing slopes of the peak support a closed-canopy stand of very large P. flexilis , the only closed-canopy stand of this species that I have seen, and in it grow the largest trees of this species known from Nevada.
  • Along the hiker's trails up Thomas and Lamoille Canyons in the Ruby Mountains of Nevada, where it grows with P. albicaulis . It is interesting to see how these very similar white pines share the habitat in the Ruby Mountains. Limber pine generally occurs at somewhat lower elevations. Where the two species co-occur, limber pine typically occupies relatively rocky granitic substrates, while whitebark pine is usually found in areas with deep soils. Below the elevation limit of whitebark, limber pine moves onto deep soils, often in mountain mahogany ( Cercocarpus ledifolius ) woodlands. Above the elevation limit of limber, whitebark pine occurs on some extremely rocky sites.

Remarks

The common name "limber" refers to the tough, flexible twigs. The seeds are an important food source for rodents and certain birds ( Little 1980 ).

The fresh-cut wood has the odor of turpentine ( Kral 1993 ).

White pine blister rust ( Cronartium ribicola ), an introduced fungal disease, has afflicted this and certain other white pines ( Elias 1987 ).

This species is one of the primary hosts for the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium cyanocarpum ( Hawksworth and Wiens 1996 ).

Citations

See also

Burns and Honkala 1990 .

Kendall, Katherine C. 1995. Limber pine. In Status and Trends of the Nation's Biological Resources . USGS electronic publication. http://biology.usgs.gov/s+t/SNT/noframe/wm148.htm , accessed 2002.09.03.

Lanner 1983 .

Schoettle, A.W. and S.G. Rochelle. 2000. Morphological variation of Pinus flexilis (Pinaceae), a bird-dispersed pine, across a range of elevations. American Journal of Botany 87:1797-1806. Available: http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/full/87/12/1797 , accessed 2008.01.07.

Home

Back | Site map | Contact us

Copyright

Edited by Christopher J. Earle

Page updated on 2009.11.15

URL: http://www.conifers.org/pi/pin/flexilis.htm

Back to top

Following served from Oregon State University
   
Top | See original context

Following served from University of Maryland
   
Top | See original context

Following modified from Virgina Tech Forestry Department
   
Top | See original

Following modified from US Forest Service
   Top | See original

Pinus flexilis James

Limber Pine

Pinaceae -- Pine family

Robert Steele

Limber pine (Pinus flexilis), also known as white pine or Rocky Mountain white pine, is a long-lived, slow-growing tree of small to medium size. Its wood, light in weight, close-grained, and pale yellow, is used for rough construction, mine timbers, railroad ties, and poles. Its harvest is incidental to that of other, more desirable species.

Habitat

Native Range

Limber pine grows from Alberta and southeastern British Columbia to New Mexico, Arizona, and eastern California. Notable outliers of this general distribution are found in the western portions of North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska, and in eastern Oregon and southwestern California.

In the northern half of its distribution, limber pine is generally found near lower tree line and on dry sites in the montane forests. Between the 45th and 40th parallels, it grows in both lower and upper elevation forests and anywhere in between on dry, windswept sites. Its position gradually shifts upward in more southerly latitudes, so that in southern portions of its distribution, limber pine is more common from upper montane to alpine tree line, with only minor occurrences in the lower forested zones. Because of this adaptability, limber pine ranges in elevation from about 870 m (2,850 ft) in North Dakota (29) to about 3810 m (12,500 ft) in Colorado (7).

{The native range of Pinus flexilis}
- The native range of limber pine.

Climate

Climatic data for actual limber pine habitat are quite scarce, but the general distribution of limber pine in Alberta, Montana, central Idaho, and east of the Continental Divide in Wyoming and Colorado, is in forested areas having a continental climate (2,3). This climate is typified by a relatively small amount of precipitation, with the wettest months during the growing season, very low humidity, and wide annual and diurnal temperature ranges. Winter conditions may be very cold, but relatively dry, and often include rapid fluctuations in temperature associated with chinook winds. Notable exceptions to this distribution are the small populations in eastern Oregon and adjacent Idaho, which lie within the Pacific maritime influence (3).

In the remainder of its distribution, limber pine grows in climates that tend to have either more evenly distributed yearly precipitation or a winter peak in precipitation along with summer convectional storms. Throughout its broad range, limber pine is mostly absent in areas strongly influenced by Pacific maritime weather patterns. Only at its southern limits in the mountains of eastern and southern California (10) does the pine encounter a strong pattern of proportionately high winter precipitation (3). The amount of precipitation, however, is relatively smaller than that of the Pacific Northwest.

Soils and Topography

In some areas, limber pine grows in greater numbers on certain soils, but the relationships vary geographically. In general, the substrates are Entisols. In Montana, limber pine grows mainly on calcareous substrates (26). Similarly, in eastern Idaho and western Wyoming, it grows mainly on soils derived from limestone or sandstone and is notably absent on adjacent granitic substrates (34), yet the population in South Dakota grows on soils derived from granitic rock (38). In central Idaho, limber pine is found largely on soils derived from sedimentary rocks; it is notably absent on granitic substrates, but grows in cracks of recent lava at Craters of the Moon National Monument (33). In eastern Oregon, a recently discovered population is on soils derived from serpentine (17). In Utah, it grows on soils developed from limestone, as on the Wasatch Plateau (9), and on soils derived from quartzites, shales and limestones of the Uinta Range (26). In southern Utah, it is most common on soils derived from sandstone and limestone (44). In northeastern Nevada, it also grows on various calcareous substrates (25), but in California, on substrates derived from granitic, obsidian, and pumice materials (30).

Limber pine grows on a variety of topographies, from gently rolling terrain to cliffs. It is most often found on rocky ridges and steep rocky slopes and can survive in extremely windswept areas at both lower and upper tree line.

Associated Forest Cover

As well as being dominant in the forest cover type Limber Pine (Society of American Foresters Type 219), limber pine is a minor component of the following (32); Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir (Type 206), Whitebark Pine (Type 208), Bristlecone Pine (Type 209), Interior Douglas-Fir (Type 210), Aspen (Type 217), Lodgepole Pine (Type 218), and Interior Ponderosa Pine (Type 237).

In Canada, Montana, and central Idaho, limber pine forms pure stands at lower tree line or mixes with Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and to a lesser extent, ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum). It also appears as a minor component in stands of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii), and occasionally subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa). On some sites in Idaho and Montana, it is associated with whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). In Canada, it is sometimes found with white spruce (Picea glauca).

Southward into Wyoming, southern Idaho, and northern portions of Colorado, Utah, and Nevada, limber pine may dominate windswept slopes and ridges at upper or lower tree line or appear in stands of white fir (Abies concolor), lodgepole pine, and Douglas-fir. In this region, limber pine appears most often with Engelmann spruce, subalpine fir, and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), least often with ponderosa pine. In Wyoming, limber pine occasionally coexists with whitebark pine, particularly in the Wind River Range. The two species also coexist on a few sites in northeastern Nevada (5,25), but usually where their ranges overlap they occupy different soils.

Farther south in the remainder of its range, limber pine forms open stands near upper tree line, both separately and with Great Basin bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) (44) but less often with Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine (Pinus aristata) (6,18). It is also associated with whitebark pine on the east side of the Sierra Nevada (4). Occasionally, it mixes as a minor seral species with subalpine fir and white fir (23). Where limber pine would normally mix as a seral species with other conifers, as it does farther north, the closely related southwestern white pine (Pinus strobiformis) appears in these situations, but this species does not extend onto the dry windy sites where limber pine is climax (23).

Life History

Reproduction and Early Growth

Flowering and Fruiting- Limber pine is monoecious-male and female strobili are borne separately on the same tree. As with most pines, male strobili predominate in the lower crown and female strobili most often develop at the apical end of main branches in the upper crown. Male strobili emerge from buds in the spring and are arranged in small clusters of indistinct spirals. They may be green or yellow to reddish purple but turn brown when mature and about to shed their pollen. Pollen is shed during June and July. Female strobili emerge from buds shortly after the male strobili and are green or red to purple. Cone scales flex and they remain receptive to pollen for only a relatively short time during June and July. After pollination, scales close and the strobili begin to develop slowly.

Fertilization takes place in the spring or early summer, about 13 months after pollination. Cones and seeds mature rapidly following fertilization. As they mature, cones change color from green to lustrous yellow. They are light brown when mature in August and September. Seed dispersal takes place during September and October (41).

Seed Production and Dissemination- Large seed crops are produced every 2 to 4 years and seed numbers generally range from 7,050 to 15,000/kg (3,200 to 6,800/lb) and average 10,800/kg (4,900/lb) (38). Seed size varies geographically, with a tendency for increasingly larger seeds in more southerly latitudes (14,36). Although some trees produce seed having an ineffective vestigial wing (21), most limber pine seeds are wingless.

The seeds are disseminated largely by rodents and birds. Of the birds, Clark's nutcracker is most important; it can transport pine seed for at least 23 km (14 mi) from seed source to communal caching areas (42). It can carry up to 125 limber pine seeds per trip in a sublingual pouch and buries in the ground one to five seeds per cache at a depth of 2 to 3 cm (0.8 to 1.2 in). Estimates indicate that Clark's nutcrackers cached in 1 year about 30,000 seeds per hectare (12,140/acre), most of which were limber pine (22). The birds' preferred cache sites were windswept ridges and southerly aspects where snow does not accumulate and the ground is exposed early in the spring. The locations of most limber pine stands probably reflect the site preferences of dispersal agents rather than those of the pine, since its only other apparent means of dissemination is gravity.

Seedling Development- Germination is epigeal (41). Like seed size, rate of seedling development depends on the geographic source. In one study (36), 2-year-old nursery grown seedlings from Alberta averaged 4.3 cm (1.7 in), while those from New Mexico had reached 7.4 cm (2.9 in). Fall-sown seed, properly fertilized, produced a pencil-sized 2-0 seedling suitable for field planting (14). In the wild, many seedlings develop in clusters from Clark's nutcracker seed caches (20). The seedlings withstand this competition well and often retain the clumped habit into maturity.

Vegetative Reproduction- No information is currently available.

Sapling and Pole Stages to Maturity

Growth and Yield- The slow growth rate and poor form normally attributed to limber pine discourages commercial interest in its use for timber and there is little information regarding its growth and yield. There apparently has been no attempt, however, to plant this species on forest sites superior to those chosen by birds and rodents that cache the seed. Where occasional limber pines grow in more densely forested stands with other tree species, sapling and pole size trees are often straight and single stemmed. One study (29) suggests, however, that limber pine growth rates may be greater on exposed windy knolls than on warmer south slopes and more moist north slopes.

Rooting Habit- Type of substrate undoubtedly influences the rooting habit of limber pine. On many of the very rocky sites where it grows, the root system must follow the pattern of rock fracturing. As a result, most limber pine are quite wind firm. In nurseries, where there are better soil conditions, it develops a more uniform root system and can be transplanted by the ball and burlap method if previously root pruned (7). Roots of limber pine are also known to associate with a mycorrhizal fungus (Gomphidius smithii) (40).

Reaction to Competition- Limber pine is relatively intolerant of shade and therefore seral to most of its associated trees, the exceptions being quaking aspen, Rocky Mountain juniper, and possibly ponderosa pine. It is also considered seral to bristlecone pine and Douglas-fir but will codominate with these species on severe dry sites (23). As a result, on most forest sites, limber pine normally acts as a pioneer species following fire or tree removal. Except on the most severe sites, where trees remain widely spaced, limber pine shows little evidence of maintaining its population in the presence of other conifers. It is most accurately classed as a species intolerant of shade.

Damaging Agents- Fire can easily kill young limber pines because of their thin bark. Fuel loads on most limber pine sites are too light, however, to generate severe fire damage, and most of the large trees normally survive. Porcupines feed on limber pine, especially in the winter months (11). Several insects attack the pine in various ways. In Montana, the budworm (Choristoneura lambertiana ponderosana) feeds on the new needles of limber pine (37). A cone moth (Dioryctria spp. ) is presumed to have damaged limber pine seed in North Dakota (29). In northern Idaho, the woolly aphid (Pineus coloradensis) attacked limber pine seedlings growing in test plots, but the pine showed considerable resistance to this insect (16). Mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) also occasionally attacks limber pine (1).

Limber pine is susceptible to several major diseases. Spongy root and butt rot (Armillaria mellea) and the red-brown butt rot (Phaeolus schweinitzii) attack limber pine over much of its range. The crumbly brown cubical rot (Fomitopsis pinicola) and red ring rot (Phellinus pini) commonly cause heart rot in mature and damaged trees (15,27). Limber pine is susceptible to white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) and can suffer considerable mortality when susceptible species of the rust's alternate host (Ribes) are nearby. The limber pine dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium cyanocarpum) is a common parasite of this tree. Occasionally, lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe (A. americanum) attacks limber pine, and the Douglas-fir dwarf mistletoe (A. douglasii) and southwestern dwarf mistletoe (A. vaginatum subsp. cryptopodium) occur as rare parasites (12). Several foliage diseases also attack this tree, the most damaging being brown-felt snow mold (Neopeckia coulteri) (15).

Special Uses

Limber pine is seldom sought for timber, but small quantities are occasionally harvested along with more desirable species. The wood has been used for rough construction, mine timbers, railroad ties, and poles (2).

Although of marginal value for lumber, limber pine has other resource values. Its ability to grow on harsh sites often provides the only tree cover for wildlife. The large seeds are a nutritious food source for birds, rodents, and bears and were used as food by Native Americans and early pioneers (20,21,29). In areas where timber is scarce, limber pine may be an important source of fuelwood. Increasing demands for fuelwood could deplete the accessible dead trees and eventually conflict with wildlife needs for shelter and nesting cavities.

Limber pine's abilities to withstand severe wind and dry site conditions are desirable shelterbelt traits, but its slow growth rate may discourage its selection for that purpose. Young trees, however, can withstand considerable bending, a necessary trait for reforestation of snow avalanche paths, and much of the pine's natural habitat lies within avalanche areas. Some limber pine habitats are also valuable watersheds, and as a pioneer species, the pine is a logical choice for initial site protection and for increasing snowpack (39). The pine's characteristic branching pattern also adds to the esthetic appeal of the landscape, especially along ridge lines.

This tree's ability to endure very dry environments has allowed it to attain considerable age in some areas. One tree in southern California was found to be well over 1,000 years old (13); another in central Idaho was 1,650 years old (31). This feature makes limber pine a useful species in dendrochronologic studies.

Limber pine has potential as a Christmas tree, but its qualities are surpassed by southwestern white pine (14,43). Seedlings from several seed sources have grown too slowly for economical Christmas tree operations but have ornamental value as dwarfed trees and even bonsai (14). Some bonsai nurserymen also collect dwarfed limber pine from severe windy sites. As an ornamental, this species deserves more attention than current use would indicate. The ornamental trade has selected at least seven cultivated varieties: 'Columnaris'- a fastigiate form; 'Glauca' and 'Firmament'- both with exceptionally bluish-green foliage; 'Glenmore'- with longer, more silvery foliage; 'Nana'- a dwarf bushy form; 'Pendula'- with pendulous branches; and 'Tiny Temple'- a low growing form (7,19).

Genetics

Population Differences

Genetic variation exists within limber pine in a general north-south pattern, but the range of variability for any one trait is small. Some isolated populations in Wyoming, Nebraska, and Colorado appear to be more similar to those from more southern latitudes than to populations at the same latitude (36).

Races

Three possible races of limber pine have been suggested, distinguished by height growth of the seedlings: (1) a northern race ranging from Alberta to north central Colorado and northern Utah and including the only sample from California; (2) a southeastern race that includes populations from the Wyoming-Nebraska border, east central Colorado, and north central New Mexico; and (3) a southwestern race in southern Utah and western Colorado (Nevada populations were not sampled) (43). Further study, however, found no geographically associated patterns or trends when a much wider variety of characteristics was analyzed from the same seed sources (36).

Hybrids

Although zones of intergradation between limber pine and southwestern white pine are found in north central Arizona and north central New Mexico (36), no true hybrid populations of limber pine have been recorded. Limber pine has been crossed artificially with western white pine (Pinus monticola), southwestern white pine (P. strobiformis), Mexican white pine (P. ayacahuite), Himalayan pine (P. griffithii), eastern white pine (P. strobus), and possibly whitebark pine (P. albicaulis) (35).

Literature Cited

  1. Amman, G. D. 1978. Biology, ecology, and causes of outbreaks of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. In Proceedings, Symposium on Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests. p. 39-53. Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow.
  2. Arno, S. F. 1979. Forest regions of Montana. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper INT-218. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 39 p.
  3. Baker, F. S. 1944. Mountain climates of the western United States. Ecological Monographs 14:223-254.
  4. Critchfield, W. B. 1981. Personal correspondence. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA.
  5. Critchfield, W. B., and G. L. Allenbaugh. 1969. The distribution of Pinaceae in and near northern Nevada. Madroño 20(l):12-26.
  6. DeVelice, R. L., J. A. Ludwig, W. H. Moir, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1986. A classification of forest habitat types of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-131. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 59 p.
  7. Dirr, M. 1977. Manual of woody landscape plants; their identification, ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation and uses. Stipes Publishing, Champaign, IL. 536 p.
  8. Douglas, M. M., and J. R. Douglas. 1955. The distribution and growth of limber pine in Colorado. Colorado-Wyoming Academy of Science Journal 4(7):46-47.
  9. Ellison, L. 1954. Subalpine vegetation of the Wasatch Plateau, Utah. Ecological Monographs 24:89-184.
  10. Griffin, J. R., and W. B. Critchfield. 1972. The distribution of forest trees in California. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper PSW-82. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA. 114 p.
  11. Harder, L. D. 1980. Winter use of montane forests by porcupines in southwestern Alberta: preferences, density effects, and temporal changes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:13-19.
  12. Hawksworth, F. G., and D. Wiens. 1972. Biology and classification of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 401. Washing-ton, DC. 234 p.
  13. Heald, W. F. 1964. California's Methuselah trees. American Forests 70(3):34-35.
  14. Heit, C. E. 1973. Propagation from seed: testing and growing limber and Mexican border pines. American Nurseryman 137(11):8-9,64-74.
  15. Hepting, G. H. 1971. Diseases of forest and shade trees of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 386. Washington, DC. 658 p.
  16. Hoff, R. J., and G. I. McDonald. 1977. Differential susceptibility of 19 white pine species to woolly aphid (Pineus coloradensis). USDA Forest Service, Research Note INT-225. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 6 p.
  17. Johnson, C. 1981. Personal communication. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Baker, OR.
  18. Komärkova, V., R. R. Alexander, and B. C. Johnston. 1988. Forest vegetation of the Gunnison and parts of the Uncompahgre National Forests: A preliminary habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-163. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 65 p.
  19. Krüssman, G. 1985. Manual of cultivated conifers. Timber Press, Portland, OR. 361 p.
  20. Lanner, R. M. 1980. Avian seed dispersal as a factor in the ecology and evolution of limber and whitebark pines. In Proceedings, Sixth North American Forest Biology Workshop. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB. 48 p.
  21. Lanner, R. M. 1981. Personal correspondence. Utah State University, Logan.
  22. Lanner, R. M., and S. B. Vander Wall. 1980. Dispersal of limber pine seed by Clark's nutcracker. Journal of Forestry 78(10):637-639.
  23. Layser, E. F., and G. H. Schubert. 1979. Preliminary classification for the coniferous forest and woodland series of Arizona and New Mexico. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper RM-208. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 27 p.
  24. Little, E. L., Jr. 1950. Southwestern trees. A guide to the native species of New Mexico and Arizona. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 9. Washington, DC. 109 P.
  25. Loope, L. L. 1969. Subalpine and alpine vegetation of northeastern Nevada. Thesis (Ph.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC. 292 p.
  26. Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-170. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 p.
  27. Partridge, A. D. 1974. Major wood decays in the Inland Northwest. Natural Resource Series 3. Idaho Research Foundation, Moscow. 125 p.
  28. Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-34. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 p.
  29. Potter, L. D., and D. L. Green. 1964. Ecology of a northeastern outlying stand of Pinus flexilis. Ecology 45:866-868.
  30. Rockwell, R. 1981. Personal communication. (Retired.) Inyo National Forest, Bishop, CA.
  31. Schulman, E. 1956. Dendroclimatic changes in semiarid America. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 142 p.
  32. Society of American Foresters. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. F. H. Eyre, ed. Washington, DC. 148 p.
  33. Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-114. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 137 p.
  34. Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho and western Wyoming. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-144. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 p.
  35. Steinhoff, R. J. 1972. White pines of western North America and Central America. In Biology of rust resistance in forest trees: proceedings of a NATO-IUFRO advanced study institute, August 1969. p. 215-232. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 1221. Washington, DC. 681 p.
  36. Steinhoff, R. J., and J. W. Andresen. 1971. Geographic variation in Pinus flexilis and Pinus strobiformis and its bearing on their taxonomic status. Silvae Genetica 20:159-167.
  37. Stevens, R. E., T. K. Borg, and T. 0. Thatcher. 1977. Notes on a pine-feeding budworm, Choristoneura lambertiana ponderosana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in the Colorado Rockies. The Canadian Entomologist 109(9):1269-1274.
  38. Thilenius, J. F. 1970. Am isolated occurrence of limber pine (Pinus flexilis James) in the Black Hills of South Dakota. American Midland Naturalist 84(2):411-417.
  39. Thompson, J. R., 0. D. Knipe, and P. M. Johnson. 1976. Wind breaks may increase water yield from the grassland islands in Arizona's mixed conifer forests. In Hydrology and water resources in Arizona and the southwest, vol. 6. Proceedings, Arizona Academy of Science, Tucson. p. 323-329.
  40. Trappe, J. M. 1962. Fungus associates of ectotrophic mycorrhizae. The Botanical Review 28:538-606.
  41. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1974. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. C. S. Schopmeyer, tech. coord. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 450. Washington, DC. 883 p.
  42. Vander Wall, S. B., and R. P. Balda. 1977. Coadaptations of the Clark's nutcracker and the pinon pine for efficient seed harvest and dispersal. Ecological Monographs 47:89-111.
  43. Wright, J. W., F. H. Kung, R. A. Reed, and others. 1970. The Christmas tree possibilities of southwestern white and limber pines. American Christmas Tree Journal 14(4):27-31.
  44. Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-187. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 p.

Following modified from Plants Database, United States Department of Agriculture
   Top | See original

Link: Skip repetitive navigation links
USDA and NRCS Identifier NRCS Logo
USDA.gov Web Site PLANTS photo banner
PLANTS Home  about PLANTS  PLANTS Team  Partners of PLANTS  What  National Plant Data Center Web Site  Help using PLANTS  Contact PLANTS
 
 Search the PLANTS Web site
 Name Search

 State Search
 Advanced Search
 Search Help
PLANTS Topics
 
 Alternative Crops
 Characteristics
 Classification
 Culturally Significant
 Distribution Update
 Fact Sheets & Plant Guides
 Invasive and Noxious Weeds
 Links
 Plant Materials Publications
 Threatened & Endangered
 Wetland Indicator Status
 
PLANTS Image Gallery
 
 40,000+ Plant Images
 Submit Your Digital Images
 
Download PLANTS data
 
 Complete PLANTS Checklist
 State PLANTS Checklist
 Advanced Search Download
 Symbols for Unknown Plants
 NRCS State GSAT Lists
 NRCS State Plants Lists
 PLANTS Posters
 
Related tools
 
 Crop Nutrient Tool
 Ecological Site Information System
 PLANTS Identification Keys
 Plant Materials Web Site
 Other NRCS Tech
Resources
 VegSpec
 
 
You are here: Home / PLANTS Profile Printer-Friendly Printer-Friendly / Plug-Ins
PLANTS Profile
Alabama Alaska Arkansas Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Manitoba New Brunswick Labrador Newfoundland Nova Scotia Ontario Prince Edward Island Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut Greenland Saint Pierre and Miquelon

 

Pinus flexilis James
limber pine

       
Symbol:   PIFL2  
Group:   Gymnosperm  
Family:   Pinaceae  
Duration:   Perennial  
Growth Habit:   Tree  
Native Status:  
L48    N
CAN    N



Click on the image below to enlarge it and download a high-resolution JPEG file.
Photo of Pinus flexilis James
©J.S. Peterson. USDA NRCS NPDC . United States, CA, Davis, University of California Davis Arboretum. February 4, 2002. Usage Requirements . Any use of copyrighted images requires notification of the copyright holder.
 
More Information:
 

Images:
Pinus flexilis James

Click on a thumbnail to view an image, or see all the Pinus thumbnails at the PLANTS Gallery
View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James View a larger version of this image and Profile page for Pinus flexilis James
 

Distribution:
Pinus flexilis James

View Native Status
Distribution Map Legend

See U.S. county distributions (when available) by clicking on the map or the linked states below:

USA ( AZ , CA , CO , ID , MT , ND , NE , NM , NV , OR , SD , UT , WY ), CAN (AB, BC)
 

Related Taxa:
Pinus flexilis James

View 9 genera in Pinaceae , 76 species in Pinus
 

Classification:
Pinus flexilis James

Click on a scientific name below to expand it in the PLANTS Classification Report.
   
Kingdom Plantae – Plants
Subkingdom Tracheobionta – Vascular plants
Superdivision Spermatophyta – Seed plants
Division Coniferophyta – Conifers
Class Pinopsida
Order Pinales
Family Pinaceae – Pine family
Genus Pinus L. – pine
Species Pinus flexilis James – limber pine
 

Threatened and Endangered Information:
Pinus flexilis James

This plant is listed by the U.S. federal government or a state. Common names are from state and federal lists. Click on a place name to get a complete protected plant list for that location.

Nevada :
limber pine              Protected as a Cactus, Yucca, or Christmas tree
 

More Accounts and Images:
Pinus flexilis James

View photographs from CalPhotos.

View species account from USDA Forest Service Fire Effects Information System (FEIS).

View species account and distribution map from Flora of North America (FNA).

View species account from ARS Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN).

View taxonomic account from Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) for ITIS Taxonomic Serial Number 183343.

View species account and distribution map from Jepson Interchange (University of California - Berkeley).

View species account from Kemper Center for Home Gardening.

View species account and photographs from Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center Native Plant Information Network (NPIN).

View species account from Native American Ethnobotany (University of Michigan - Dearborn).

View 2 propagation protocols from Native Plants Network.

 

Related Web Sites:
Pinus flexilis James

CT-University of Connecticut Plant Database

Canada-British Columbia-Forests

Conifers From Around The World (Arboretum de Villardebelle)

DE-University of Delaware Botanic Gardens

Gymnosperm Database

IL-Selecting Trees For Your Home (University of Illinois Extension)

NC-Plant Fact Sheet (NCSU)

OR-Oregon State University Landscape Plants

UK-Plants For A Future

USDA FS

USDA Forest Service-Silvics of North America

VA-Virginia Tech Dendrology

 
 
Time Generated: 02/09/2010 07:13 PM MST  

 PLANTS Home | USDA.gov | NRCS | Site Map | Policies and Links
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement

Following modified from CalPhotos
   Top | See original


CalPhotos     Photo Database

 

Number of matches : 42
Query: SELECT * FROM img WHERE ready=1 and taxon like "Pinus flexilis%" and (lifeform != "specimen_tag" OR lifeform != "Plant") ORDER BY taxon

Click on the thumbnail to see an enlargement

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0024 3291 1997 0020 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 2000 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0024 3291 1997 0019 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 2000 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine, White Pine
ID: 0000 0000 1202 0911 [detail]
© 2000 Gary A. Monroe

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 8076 3101 3987 0010 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 1998 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 8076 3101 3987 0008 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 1998 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 1335 3153 0669 0083 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 2002 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 7335 3182 4412 0009 [detail]
© 1995 Saint Mary's College of California

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 7335 3182 4412 0008 [detail]
© 1995 Saint Mary's College of California

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 7335 3182 4412 0006 [detail]
© 1995 Saint Mary's College of California

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 7335 3182 4412 0005 [detail]
© 1995 Saint Mary's College of California

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 8253 3202 3492 0066 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 1999 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine, White Pine
ID: 0000 0000 1202 0912 [detail]
© 2000 Gary A. Monroe

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 7335 3182 4412 0004 [detail]
© 1995 Saint Mary's College of California

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 8076 3101 3987 0009 [detail]
Charles Webber
© 1998 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 7335 3182 4412 0007 [detail]
© 1995 Saint Mary's College of California

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 1351 3151 0540 0004 [detail]
J. E.(Jed) and Bonnie McClellan
© 2005 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 1342 3162 2710 0116 [detail]
J. E.(Jed) and Bonnie McClellan
© 2007 California Academy of Sciences

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
ID: 3333 3333 1007 0094 [detail]
© University and Jepson Herbaria

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0000 0000 1208 1865 [detail]
© 2008 Dr. Amadej Trnkoczy

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0000 0000 0909 1594 [detail]
© 2009 Ryan Gilmore

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0000 0000 0909 1740 [detail]
© 2009 Barry Breckling

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0000 0000 1109 2454 [detail]
© 2009 Gary A. Monroe

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
ID: 0000 0000 1109 2457 [detail]
© 2009 Gary A. Monroe

Pinus flexilis
Pinus flexilis
Limber Pine
(shown with Pinus longaeva )
ID: 0000 0000 0110 0227 [detail]
© 2010 Lee Dittmann

Using these photos: A variety of organizations and individuals have contributed photographs to CalPhotos. Please follow the usage guidelines provided with each image. Use and copyright information, as well as other details about the photo such as the date and the location, are available by clicking on the [detail] link under the thumbnail. See also: Using the Photos in CalPhotos .   


Copyright © 1995-2010 UC Regents. All rights reserved.

CalPhotos is a project of BSCIT     University of California, Berkeley

Updated: 2010-02-10 02:17:36 gmt
Discover Life | Top
© Designed by The Polistes Corporation