Cost of ATBI
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 15:58:49 -0400 To: Keith_Langdon@ccmail.itd.nps.gov (Keith Langdon) From: pick@pick.uga.edu (John Pickering) Subject: Cost of ATBI Keith, Sorry that you are upset, but I beg to differ with you on several counts about the projected cost of the ATBI. No team decision has been taken regarding our strategic plan or budget, so I am hardly breaking ranks. My recollection of the Board's response to my $25M+ per year estimate for the ATBI was that we may not be able to raise that amount, not that it was an unreasonable estimate to fund the taxonomy that we need. I suggest that you and others do the numbers and come up with better estimates that we can share in our strategic planning. If it is $1 to $10 million total, then consider the ATBI dead. The taxonomists that I know are not willing to commit to a project of such limited scope. They can each get more money working elsewhere. Most taxonomists are looking for funding and not to volunteer in the Smokies. If we estimate that it will take 1,000 taxonomists to clean up the names of 100,000 species, something that Norm, Mike, and I feel is a reasonable estimate, then we need to plan to fund that many. If we don't fund that many, then we are either asking that they volunteer or we are not doing an "All-TBI". As they won't volunteer en masse, and as we are planning an All-TBI, then we need to estimate how much it will cost per taxonomist to entice and fund them to work in the Smokies. I think that $25K per year is a reasonable amount to fund a graduate student, travel, and minimal supplies, though I admit that you might be able to low-ball it and get some taxonomists to work for $15K per year. Next we need to estimate how long it will take each taxonomist to sample, sort, clean up the names, build identification keys, check 100 web pages for accuracy, etc. Again, I am unsure how long this will take, but certainly no less than 4 years, based on my experience with Elizabeth and our wasps, and probably closer to 7 or more. Thus, over $100M is my best "guess" for the taxonomy part of the ATBI, but we might be able to low-ball it for $60M. Then we need to consider facilities, databasing, education, ... In short, I challenge you or anyone else to come up with a realistic estimate under $100 million over 15 years for the Smokies ATBI. Finally, and more importantly, is the fact that we are generating public support because we have a grand vision -- a moon shot, if you wish. Jocelyn would not write a Science note about an ATBI that anticipated a budget of $10M. Otherwise she should write about each of the 20 LTER sites and other projects of similar size. The public and press are captivated by our vision -- knowing about ALL the creatures in one area. This is a huge, magnificent undertaking with major payoffs to the Park, science, and society. We must stop hiding the real cost. Yes, we will have volunteers and contributions from scientists that are not in our budgeted cost, sweat equity in Dan's lingo, but I fear that underestimating or low-balling our budget at this point will result in the taxonomists, funding sources, and others not taking us seriously. Once we agree on about what it will cost, then we can develop a strategic plan to raise the money. While I feel that we will ultimately need over $25M+ per year, I am quite aware that it will take 5 or more years to ramp up to that level. I am copying this to our Board, taxonomy leaders, and others for general consumption, because it is of such a critical concern to our credibility and planning. I hope you and they will respond and add better estimates to the debate. In particular, I hope the taxonomists as a 1,000 member community will tell us what it will cost for them to participate and succeed. I will post this and everyones response on our website. Let our strategic planning begin. Cheers, Pick >Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:54:02 -0400 >From: Keith_Langdon@ccmail.itd.nps.gov (Keith Langdon) >Subject: SCIENCE article >To: pick@pick.uga.edu >Cc: Chuck_Parker@ccmail.itd.nps.gov (Chuck Parker), > Becky_Nichols@ccmail.itd.nps.gov (Becky Nichols), pswhite@unc.edu, > wfharris@utk.edu > > > Pick - As you know, J. Kaiser from SCIENCE, is doing a note on the > ATBI. She called me today and asked if I would review what she had > written. She wanted me to check for factual errors, and wanted me > specifically to comment on the draft that you had already worked on > with her. I was given about 20 minutes to respond. I was UPSET to see > that you were quoted as saying the ATBI will cost "at least $100 > million". I asked her to tone it down, and she agreed to add that > others involved disputed that high a figure, which is not exactly what > I wanted, but given the time constraints... > > I was sure we had agreed to hold off on making "wild ass guesses" > about how much this will cost until we actually undertake a detailed > cost analysis for the strategic plan later this fall. This plan would > have to have input from many of the scientists who have come to "scope > out" the Park thus far. As we have discussed, the Costa Rican > estimates are not directly transferable to here for several important > reasons. > > I will admit to exasperation here. I share your wish to put a figure > on the ATBI, but what facts are your estimates based on ? I don't > want to "low ball" a figure, I just don't think the potential allies > we have to win over in government, corporations, NGO's and others are > served by everyone involved GUESSING that it will cost $250 million > (your May guess) or over $100 milion or $1 million for that matter. > This has the potential to seriously wound our efforts, I believe. > > I've talked to several folks at the May board meeting whose > recollection is the same as mine on this issue. I don't understand > why we can't stick to a team decision on this. Please inform me if I > am mistaken. > > Keith
Discover Life in America | Science | Strategic Plan & Budget | John Pickering - 9 June, 1999 |