429.
Carex
umbellata
Schkuhr ex Willdenow, Sp. Pl. 4(1): 290. 1805.
Carex en ombelle
Carex abdita E. P. Bicknell; C. microrhyncha Mackenzie
Plants densely cespitose; rhizomes ascending to erect, reddish brown, 0—5 mm, stout. Culms 3—7.5(—18) cm, scabrous distally; bases (remnants of old leaves) weakly to strongly fibrous. Leaf blades pale green, greatly exceeding culms, 1—2.3(—3.8) mm wide, herbaceous, glabrous abaxially, strongly scabrous to papillose adaxially. Inflorescences with both staminate and proximal spikes; peduncles of basal spikes erect, short to elongate, slender; peduncle of staminate spikes 0.7—5.2(—12.3) mm; proximal nonbasal bracts scalelike, usually shorter than (occasionally equaling) inflorescences. Spikes: proximal pistillate spikes 2—5 (basal spikes 1—3); cauline spikes overlapping with staminate spikes, with (1—)4—12 perigynia; staminate spikes 4.6—13 × 0.7—2.2 mm. Scales: pistillate scales reddish brown with narrow white margins, ovate, 2.8—3.9 × 1.5—1.9 mm, equaling or exceeding perigynia, apex acute to acuminate; staminate scales ovate to lanceolate, 3.5—5.1 × 1.1—2.2 mm, apex obtuse to acute. Anthers 1.7—2.2 mm. Perigynia pale green to pale brown, veinless, obovoid to globose, rarely ellipsoid, obtusely trigonous in cross section, 2.2—3.2 × 1—1.4 mm; beak straight, pale green to pale brown, strongly 2-edged, 0.4—1 mm, weakly ciliate-serrulate, apical teeth 0.1—0.2 mm. Stigmas 3. Achenes brown, ellipsoid, obtusely trigonous in cross section, 1.4—1.7 × 1—1.3 mm. 2n = 30, 32.
Fruiting mid Mar—mid Jul. Open, dry to mesic, circumneutral to calcareous, clayey, sandy, and rocky fields, pastures, tall-grass prairies, glades, ridges, slopes, bluffs, dunes, barrens, open deciduous and mixed woodlands, also on serpentine and basalt, often at edges of ant hills; 90—300 m; Greenland; B.C., N.B., Nfld. and Labr., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask.; Ala., Ark., Ga., Ill., Ind., Kans., Ky., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., Tex., W.Va., Wis.
Some botanists think Carex microrhyncha should be retained as a distinct species. A revision of the C. umbellata-C. tonsa complex may reveal distinctions; until that work is done, we prefer to combine C. microrhyncha with C. umbellata.
